- Home
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
- Māori and Pasifika
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Guidelines and forms
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Reform of Vocational Education
- International Education planning
- international
- About us
Chemistry - trial annotated exemplar Level 3 AS91387
Carry out an investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis (3.1)
Show: All Chemistry exemplars
Read the STANDARD |
|
Download all these exemplars and commentary (PDF, 315KB) |
This annotated exemplar is intended for teacher use only. The student work shown does not always represent a complete sample of what is required. Selected extracts are used, focused on the grade boundaries, in order to assist assessors to make judgements at the national standard.
Excellence
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Excellence, the student needs to carry out an investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis. This involves producing evidence of a report on the investigation that includes justification of the steps used, a comprehensive evaluation of the investigation, and shows accurate processing of the collected data including the correct use of significant figures and units. The student needs to produce evidence to justify their method in terms of the reactions involved, the nature of the sample, how the processed data supports their conclusion, reliability of the collected data, and how the results of their investigation link to chemical principles/ real life applications. This student has justified the steps taken in their investigation by linking the key reactions involved to the relevant steps in their investigation (1). The student has also justified how the processed data links to the conclusion (2) and linked the conclusion of their investigation to real life applications and chemistry ideas (3). The student has provided evidence of evaluating the reliability of the data and the procedure used as well as possible sources of error (4). |
High Merit
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Merit, the student needs to undertake effective project management to support technological practice. This involves:
This student has accurately processed data (1), given a conclusion that links the processed data to the purpose of the investigation (2), and explained how the procedure contributed to the collection of quality data (3). This student begins to justify the steps used in the procedure in terms of the reactions that are taking place to allow for the collection of the data. This evidence does not reach Excellence because the student needs to evaluate their investigation in terms of how the conclusion(s) relate to chemistry ideas and/or real-life applications, the reliability of the data, and how the processed data supports their conclusion(s). |
Low Merit
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Merit, the student needs to carry out an in-depth investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis. This involves:
This student has accurately processed data (1), given a conclusion that links the processed data to the purpose of the investigation (2), and given an explanation of how the procedure used contributed to the collection of quality data (3). For a more secure Merit, the student could provide evidence of the mathematic steps used to determine the concentration of S2O32-, use appropriate significant figures and units, and give a more comprehensive evaluation. |
High Achieved
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Achieved, the student needs to carry out an investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis. This involves:
This student has given a statement of the purpose of the investigation (1), processed data (2) and given a conclusion that is based on processed data (3). To reach Merit, the student could investigate a minimum of 5 values of the independent variable in order to reach a valid conclusion, give a conclusion that links the processed data to the purpose of the investigation, and give an explanation of how the procedure used contributed to the collection of quality data. |
Low Achieved
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Achieved, the student needs to carry out an investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis. This involves:
This student has explored a possible trend or pattern in the quantity of substance in a sample and collected a sufficient quantity of data to enable a conclusion to be reached (1). They have processed the data, with some errors (2), to reach a conclusion based on the processed data (3). For a more secure Achieved, the student could more clearly state the purpose and the conclusion. |
High Not Achieved
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Achieved, the student needs to carry out an investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis. This involves:
This student has investigated a possible trend and stated a purpose (1) and made a conclusion based on some of the processed data (2). To reach Achieved, the student could include a summary of the processed data in the report, and base the conclusion on more than one value of the independent variable. |