- Home
- Qualifications and standards
- NCEA
- Māori and Pasifika
-
Providers and partners
- About education organisations
- NZQA's quality assurance system for tertiary education organisations
- Guidelines and forms
- Consistency of graduate outcomes
- Approval, accreditation and registration
- Monitoring and Assessment
- Self-assessment
- External evaluation and review
- Assessment and moderation of standards
- Submitting results and awarding qualifications and micro-credentials
- Tertiary and International Learners Code of Practice
- Offshore use of qualifications and programmes
- Reform of Vocational Education
- International Education planning
- Rules Consultation
- international
- About us
Social Studies - annotated exemplar Level 3 AS91597
Conduct a critical social inquiry (3.2)
Show: All Social Studies exemplars
Read the STANDARD |
|
Download all these exemplars and commentary (PDF, 227KB) |
This annotated exemplar is intended for teacher use only. The student work shown does not always represent a complete sample of what is required. Selected extracts are used, focused on the grade boundaries, in order to assist assessors to make judgements at the national standard.
Low Excellence
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Excellence, the student needs to conduct a critical social inquiry comprehensively. This involves using Social Studies concepts and giving specific evidence to:
The focus of this inquiry is inorganic waste collection. The student has developed research questions and gathered background ideas and information and used Social Studies concepts and specific evidence to report the findings by answering the focusing questions (not shown here). The student has explained, compared and contrasted points of view, values and perspectives that relate to the focus of the inquiry (not shown here). The student has reflected on and critically evaluated both the processes and the findings of the inquiry (not shown here). In this extract, the student provides a sufficient comprehensive critical evaluation of the findings (1) and considers the implications of the findings in contexts outside the inquiry (2). For a more secure Excellence, the student could consider the implications of the findings in contexts outside the inquiry in more detail. |
High Merit
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Merit, the student needs to conduct a critical social inquiry, in depth. This involves using Social Studies concepts and giving specific evidence to:
The focus of this inquiry is inorganic waste collection. The student has developed research questions and gathered background ideas and information, and used Social Studies concepts and specific evidence to report the findings by answering the focusing questions (not shown here). The student has reflected on and evaluated the findings of the inquiry and critically evaluated the process including making suggestions for improvement (not shown here). In this extract the student has explained, (1) compared and contrasted (4) points of view, values (2) and perspectives (3) of Tyla, Martin and an anonymous resident. To reach Excellence, the student could critically evaluate the findings and consider the implications of the findings in contexts outside the inquiry. |
Low Merit
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Merit, the student needs to conduct a critical social inquiry in depth. This involves using Social Studies concepts and giving specific evidence to:
The focus of this inquiry is a school ball falling during Ramadan. The student has developed research questions and gathered background ideas and information, and used Social Studies concepts and specific evidence to report the findings by answering the focusing questions (not shown here). The student has reflected on and evaluated the findings of the inquiry, and critically evaluated the process including making suggestions for improvement. (not shown here). In this extract the student has explained (1) and provided some detail when comparing and contrasting (4) points of view, values (2) and perspectives (3) of Amun and the Deputy Principal. For a more secure Merit, the student could provide more detailed information to compare and contrast the points of view, values and perspectives that relate to the focus of the inquiry. |
High Achieved
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Achieved, the student needs to conduct a critical social inquiry. This involves using Social Studies concepts and giving specific evidence to:
In this extract the student has decided on the focus of the inquiry (1) which is Te Kotahitanga. The student has developed research questions (2), gathered background ideas and information (not exemplified here) and used Social Studies concepts (3) and specific evidence (4) to report the findings. The student has described Dia and Russell’s points of view (6), values (7) and perspectives (8) that underpin their participation and/or action in society and how these relate to the focus of the inquiry. The student has reflected on and evaluated the findings of the inquiry (9) and critically evaluated the process (10) including making suggestions for improvement (11). To reach Merit, the student could provide an in depth critical social inquiry by explaining, and comparing and contrasting points of view, values and perspectives that relate to the focus of the inquiry. |
Low Achieved
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Achieved, the student needs to conduct a critical social inquiry. This involves using Social Studies concepts and giving specific evidence to:
In this extract the student has decided on the focus of the inquiry (1) which is Euthanasia. The student has developed research questions (2) and gathered background ideas and information (not shown here), and used Social Studies concepts (3) and specific evidence (4) to report the findings. The student has described Casey and Jack’s points of view (6), provided some evidence of their values (7) and perspectives (8) that underpin their participation and/or action in society and how these relate to the focus of the inquiry. The student has reflected on and evaluated the findings of the inquiry (9) and just sufficiently critically evaluated the process (10) including making suggestions for improvement (11). For a more secure Achieved, the student could:
|
High Not Achieved
Commentary | ||
---|---|---|
For Achieved, the student needs to conduct a critical social inquiry. This involves using Social Studies concepts and giving specific evidence to:
In this extract the student has decided on the focus of the inquiry (1) which is Te Kotahitanga. The student has developed research questions (2) and gathered background ideas and information (not shown here), and used Social Studies concepts (3) and specific evidence (4) to report the findings. The student has described Dia and Russell’s points of view (6) that underpin their participation and/or action in society and how these relate to the focus of the inquiry. The student has reflected on and evaluated the findings of the inquiry (7) and just sufficiently critically evaluated the process (8). To reach Achieved, the student could:
|