Authenticity

Information for education providers about authenticity when assessing learner work

Authenticity challenges

Authenticity is the assurance that evidence of achievement produced by a learner is their own.

There are 3 broad categories of authenticity challenges that need to be managed during the assessment process.

Education providers and assessors must be aware of the potential for learners to:

  • copy from another person or source (plagiarism)
  • have too much guidance from the teacher or assessor
  • get specific answers for the assessment activity because it is publicly available (such as Ministry of Education or Te Kete Ipurangi (TKI) activities on the internet).

Verifying authenticity

Assessors must verify that work submitted for assessment was produced by learners.

Assessors must also consider (and manage) the potential for work to have been copied, borrowed from another learner, photocopied from a book or downloaded from the internet.

Assessment activities are publicly available for download from websites such as TKI, and materials purchased from commercial suppliers and subject associations may have been quality assured by NZQA's Quality Assured Assessment Materials (QAAM) process. The QAAM does not assure authenticity.

Managing authenticity for public source materials includes changing specific figures, measurements or data sources, setting a different context or topic to be investigated or a different text to read or perform. Assessors must manage authenticity issues for all assessments regardless of source.

It is appropriate for learners to learn from others and to gather information from a variety of sources. However, assessors must be clear that the work to be assessed has been processed and produced by the learner.

Care must be taken to ensure that teachers or assessors don't help learners complete work for assessment. The assessed work must be the work of the learner, including when performance is in a group context or conditions allow for open book assessment.

For example, whole-class brainstorming cannot include the answers to specific questions in an assessment, but could include topics that learners then go on to research individually.

Strategies to ensure authenticity include:

  • modifying assessments available from publicly available sources
  • changing the context of the assessment from year to year
  • supervising the research process by including regular checkpoints
  • requiring plans, resource material and draft work to be submitted with the final product
  • keeping on-going work on site
  • oral questioning to confirm a student's understanding or requiring a repeat performance where there is doubt
  • being familiar with or controlling the resources available
  • controlling group work by breaking the task into group and individual components
  • requiring a signature on an authenticity statement to highlight the issue for both parents and students.

Get more information or give us feedback